Richard Botto - Publisher of RAZOR Magazine
Richard Botto Biography Richard Botto in the news Photographs of Richard Botto A collection of writings by Richrd Botto

Richard Botto, Editor in Chief / CEO of RAZOR Magazine, has created the definitive men's magazine which features the best in men's fashion, travel, sports, autos, celebrities, technology, humor, fiction, fitness and more.



Click Here
to visit RAZOR

RAZOR Magazine July / August 2003 Issue - Click on Cover Image To Purchase Back Issues. RAZOR Magazine is Published by Richard Botto and RAZOR Media LLC.WRITINGS: RICHARD BOTTO

Back to Writings Main Menu

June 2004

Permission To Speak Freely Please

Permission the Speak Freely, Please?

Say what you will about Howard Stern, but it would be hard to argue that his show has changed all that much over the last two decades. Yet, somehow, the FCC managed to find one show from all these years that, to them, contained offensive material and thus fined Clear Channel Communications 495K. The government… objectifying the subjective… this one time.

Now here's the thing about Stern, you either like his brand of entertainment or you don't. If you fall into the latter category, you have every right under the Constitution to tune out. If you deem him obscene you have made a judgment call for yourself not to listen. But understand, Stern's show doesn't violate anyone's right to life or liberty. Actually, singling him out as the poster child for indecency in a country where there are dozens of examples of double entendres, sex jokes and vulgarities on radio morning zoos and television every day violates his rights. Unfortunately the people on the right are sitting behind load bearing stanchions and can't see that irony play out on the arena floor.

So why now? Why Stern? Why is the government suddenly throwing around some colorful language and collecting serious green on an Amendment to the Constitution that is supposed to be black and white? A glance at the calendar, the political one that is, tells you all you need to know.

It's amazing to me, this persistent fascination of finessing the First Amendment to the point of absurdity, when surely the lack of attention to the true meaning and/or abuses of the Second Amendment is of a much more dangerous concern. The government is playing an adult game of Sticks and Stones, while thousands of illegal firearms trade hands each and every day in this country. I have never known an indecent word to kill someone, but guns do and people on drugs with guns do as well.

We're a society that is more fearful of language, nudity and sex than we are of violence. A movie that has the dialogue, "I'm f*****" gets a PG-13 rating in this country. Change that line to, "I'm going to f*** you" and you're looking at an R. Call it fear of the F-word. However, stabbings, shootings and other violent acts are generously graded by the MPAA and widely accepted as family fare.

Can we really say that a Stern broadcast is any more dangerous, immoral or unethical than the lies and hate spewed by so-called political pundits to the left and right on the dial? Is the Lesbian Dating Game any more offensive or damaging than the images processed during any evening news telecast?

The point is, what is the use of being policed without the ability to police ourselves? We point fingers, but never while looking in the mirror. If you're an adult, you can exercise your freedom of choice. If you are a parent, guide your children. Are we so irresponsible, so unable to take care of ourselves that we need the government to do so? Do we need the same people who quote the Constitution verbatim when it fits their agenda to smudge the bold type of the First Amendment in an effort to tell us what we can and cannot listen to on the radio or see on television? Are we that helpless?

Let me qualify all of this by saying that I do not listen to Stern all that often. Not because I find him offensive, I just simply have less time in the mornings than I did in my college days when I tuned in religiously. I choose to spend my morning commute catching up on the news or what I missed the previous night in sports. Again, my choice. That's why radios come with so many presets and an "off" button.

At this point you are either nodding your head in agreement or ready to tear apart this argument point by point. Have at me. It's one of your Constitutional rights. Just like it's Stern's right to express himself each and every morning when he hits the airwaves. We have the right to challenge the messenger and the message or to ignore it entirely. I want that option. I want control over what I watch and listen to. I want to exercise my right to speak my mind, voice my opinion. The government's job is to give power to voice, not to stifle it.

Enjoy the issue.

Richard Botto,
Editor in Chief / CEO of RAZOR Magazine - The Definitive Men's Lifestyle Magazine
www.razormagazine.com


 
Copyright 2003 RAZOR Media LLC.